Using Tumult Hype With Google DFP

I just discovered Tumult's Hype - an excellent Mac application that allows for rapid development of HTML5 based animations. It works a lot like Apple's Keynote and allowed me to put together a simple banner advertisement in all of 10 minutes. Check it out:

The only challenge is how to attach a Hype produced ad to an ad server that can track impressions and clicks. We use Google's Double Click for Publishers (DFP) platform at the Independent Media Network. It's great for showing flash ads or static images (both of which are flat files) but anything else is slightly more challenging.

After a good deal of poking around we found a workaround. This is probably not kosher with the Javascript elites, but it does the trick for us. Here's what we did:

<div style="position:relative;">
<iframe src = "http://URL_TO_YOUR_AD.HTML" width = "300" height = "250" frameborder = "0"></iframe>
<a href= "%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%http://DESTINATION_LINK" style="position:absolute; top:0; left:0; display:inline-block; width:300px; height:250px; z-index:5;" target="_blank"></a>
</div>
</div>

Essentially what we did here was make an iFrame clickable by overlaying some transparent CSS over it. Or at least I think that's what we're doing here. The %%CLICK_URL_UNESC%% macro that's appended directly ahead of the URL is what DFP uses to track the click.

We're not yet comfortable enough with this solution to roll it out for a production advertisement, but our house ad has been delivering (and clicking) flawlessly on every modern browser as well as mobile devices.

I'd love to hear from you as to whether or not this is a good practice with DFP or in general.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Review of the Black Magic Design ATEM Television Studio

First things first: the Black Magic Design ATEM Television Studio switcher is a breakthrough. Never before has it been possible to do this kind of video switching at this price point. Although completely digital the ATEM feels like analog in its ease of configuration. Cameras pop up instantly the moment they're plugged in, and the device switches between them effortlessly without stutters or lag.

There are three different versions of this device, and this one is the least expensive of the line. It lacks a few features the more expensive units have, including some of the fancier DVE effects that the others bring. But for my purposes (covering news events mostly) this device fits the bill. It can do basic chroma keying and titling but won't be able to run multiple tracks of video simultaneously.

Continue reading my review at Amazon.com (affiliate link)

What CL&P Needs to Do Right Now

CL&P continues their downward spiral of self destruction. It’s one thing to have nature deal an unexpected blow, it’s another to have a lack of attention to maintenance issues make the impact worse than it should have been.

As Connecticut residents continue to lose confidence in their electric utility monopoly, the company’s messaging isn’t helping restore that trust.  Here’s what CL&P needs to do right now:

Apologize and admit fault
CL&P’s COO Jeff Butler was asked point blank this morning by a reporter if he’d be issuing an apology on behalf of the company. His answer was to stick to his company’s line of acknowledging frustration but not admitting fault. He even took it a step further and patted himself on the back for doing a good job. This is an old school technique for a time when information was not as readily available or transmittable as it is today.

It didn’t take long for the media to discover that CL&P short paid or outright delayed payment to out-of-state crews that helped after Tropical Storm Irene. Maintenance shortfalls, understaffed line crews, and other pre-storm preparedness deficiencies also started coming to light.

Consumers have the tools to be savvier and as such our “BS detectors” have no tolerance for superlatives that even Baghdad Bob wouldn’t make. Butler would do well to simply acknowledge the company has screwed up and will be working to make things right for their customers. They can start by saying the company will absorb the repair costs and not be asking rate payers to cover them. As I wrote yesterday, they were very quick to reassure shareholders after Irene that repair costs would not eat into profits.

Stand and Answer Questions from the Media, and Later the Public
Jeff Butler’s body language says quite a bit. While he’s understandably under a lot of pressure, he’s not helping his cause by racing for the door as he did at this morning’s press conference. Butler should give enough time so that every member of the press at the briefings has an opportunity to ask him questions.

When the lights do come back on, CL&P has an obligation to appear before customers to explain what happened and what they will do to improve. That should have happened after Irene and didn’t. The company decided to instead meet with towns through regional planning agencies. They would not provide me with the dates of those meetings when I requested them.

Stop Using Social Media as a Propaganda Tool
Nothing is more insulting to families sitting in cold, dark houses than to see Tweets and YouTube videos of corporate spin. CL&P proudly touted two videos yesterday of storm damage - like somehow that will make people feel better about their lack of response.

I spoke of this before, and I think it’s worth repeating: social media does not belong solely in the hands of PR officials. Customer service should be there to answer customer questions and try to work out their individual issues.

Stop Relying on Municipalities for Customer Service Communication
In this age of direct communication, CL&P continues to cling to the notion that somehow municipalities and local property tax payers should be the ones responsible for communicating with customers. It backs up my belief that the company is not customer focused, but rather sees themselves as a customer of regulators and shareholders.

Yesterday Hartford Mayor Pedro Segarra gave exactly the kind of update that CL&P should be doing:

Why rely on elected officials to do this? Why not have your own people communicate with customers? The answer is simple: Customers are not the company's first priority.

Conclusion: It needs to be about customers!
Again all of this comes back to putting customers first. Large corporations in competitive markets are starting to realize that consumers are getting far less complacent. Just look at Bank of America’s decision to reverse some of their ATM charges this week. CL&P has not learned that lesson mainly because up until this year they didn’t have to.

My only hope is that people angry now stay angry. I felt like a lone voice as I fired off my rants in August, especially after lights came back on and life got back to normal. The company is counting on this happening again, and it simply can’t be allowed to happen. Our voices need to remain loud to be heard.

CL&P's Lack of Customer Focus Leads to Disaster

Following Tropical Storm Irene, hundreds of thousands of Connecticut residents were without power for over a week. I was one of the early voices criticizing the company's response, leading to an article that ran in most of the Journal Register Company's Connecticut newspapers.

A high voltage utility poll that serves my business and others that employ several hundred in the Essex Industrial Park. Look at the overgrowth.

My argument was that the company wasn't customer focused. They communicated completely through the mass media in very controlled situations, not even giving their customer service reps useful information to pass along on the phone. CL&P was woefully behind in operating a 21st century communication operation.

They did, however, make sure to soothe investors as revealed in a September 8, 2011 article that ran in the Wall Street Journal:

A top executive of Northeast Utilities assured investor analysts Thursday that the company will not turn to the bottom line to pay $100 million in costs related to restoring power after the remnants of Hurricane Irene hit New England, but has not determined exactly how it will eventually pay the tab.

Chief Financial Officer David McHale said the Aug. 28 storm was the costliest ever for the Hartford-based utility, with about 800,000 customers losing power at the peak of the storm.

"Now the focus will be on cost recovery for sure," he said. "We haven't gotten down to exactly how it is we're going to proceed with this."

Separate storm recovery applications or a rate case could be filed with regulators in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, he said. Right now, Northeast Utilities will finance the costs through its credit line and seek somehow to recover the costs in the future, he said.

"You will not see us sort of charge off these amounts," McHale said.

The second next pole in the string that serves high voltage service to the Essex Industrial Park. Nobody's cleared away vegetation in over a decade.

People's attention went elsewhere after the lights came back on. CL&P took advantage of this shift in attention, pointing to favorable results on a Quinnipiac University poll (most likely due to the performance of line crews, not their management). They did participate in a fluff legislative hearing where they were but one small part of a less than comprehensive review of stakeholder performance during the storm. In fact most legislators didn't even have a chance to ask questions of the utilities.

Then the winter storm hit. And once again hundreds of thousands of Connecticut residents lost power for what will likely be more than a week. Crews were nowhere to be found for days as residents shivered in unheated homes and people died of carbon monoxide poisoning.  It was learned this week that many of those the company hired to complete the post-Irene repairs weren't paid, with some checks not being cut until yesterday - over 60 days after the fact. Scorned contractors went elsewhere with their trucks when the snowstorm hit.

How can such a big company be so incompetent? It's because as a regulated monopoly they don't have to focus on their customers. Their monopoly is essentially guaranteed a profit, and as the only game in town they really only need to keep their regulators and shareholders happy. Regulators too closely tied to the industry looked the other way as line crews were cut significantly, and shareholders welcomed the profit margins that came from a growing customer base. It also led to CL&P running to analysts assuring them that ratepayers would pick up the tab for repairs - the result of the company's decades-long negligence in maintaining its infrastructure.

Connecticut Light and Power has failed the people of Connecticut.  We should have seen the warning signs when they stopped caring about us.

What did a Space Shuttle launch really sound like?

Many have asked me what does a Space Shuttle launch really sound like? As I was going through my flash cards from the last Space Shuttle launch I found this incredible audio file that I recorded on my Zoom recorder. Put on some headphones or fire up your home theater system to really experience it. You might want to view it on YouTube in HD to get the full effect.

The sound rumbles in about 25 seconds into the launch. Yes, for the first 20 or so seconds you hear absolutely nothing while witnessing one of mankind's greatet achievements rocketing free of our home planet on a pillar of fire as bright as the sun. Then you hear it: a sustained thunder that rolls in, followed by chest thumping crackles that beat any fireworks display you've ever experienced.

Read more about my NASA experiences at CTTechJunkie.com.

Review of the New Apple Thunderbolt Display

My reason for purchasing the new Apple Thunderbolt display was for the image quality which is definitely worth every one of the 5 stars I'm rating it.

Like all Apple products the Thunderbolt display is exceptionally well built and designed, offering the same display components as the beautiful 27" iMac.

Read my complete review at Amazon.com

Update on the Kagi / Visual Hub Story with Response form Kagi's CEO and Tyler Loch, Visual Hub Author

You can see my original post on the Kagi / VisualHub saga here: here.

I'm running out to a meeting but wanted to get a quick update in.

Kagi CEO Kee Nethery reached out to me via telephone a few minutes ago. Kagi was the payment processor for Visualhub when it was being sold as a product. Kagi processes payments and distributes serial registration codes that would unlock the software for unlimited use.

Nethery said sales of Visualhub were in the 'thousands' before author Tyler Loch decided to shut the product down in 2008. When OS X Lion came out Visualhub stopped working and many remaining users of Visualhub contacted Kagi for help. Kagi often answers simple questions that users ask of the payment processor even though the individual software developer is ultimately responsible for maintaining their product.

"What we initially did was forwarded people over to Tyler's update page that has three applescripts [posted]," Nethery said, "Personally I don't find that to be a problem. Most of the people we deal with did have a problem and it's way past their comfort level."

In the case of Visualhub, Nethery said they had a "support nightmare" as some users had difficulty installing the update that required digging into the Visualhub application file.

Nethery said the company took the unprecedented step of issuing the $4.99 updater to automate the process. It takes the three scripts that Loch provided on his website and automatically backs up and modifies the Visualhub application, leaving a new patched application called "Visualhub Lion" that works with the new Apple operating system. It also includes an additional update Loch made available to the underlying video processing engine that powers the product.

Kagi has not updated a product before, as Nethery says these kinds of functionality patches are "trivial" for someone who is maintaining an active product. Nethery expressed some frustration that Loch walked away from a product that was selling well and was quite popular in its day (and still is).

"We've never had someone walk away from a business before," he said.

In a statement, Loch says that he did not authorize Kagi to issue the patch.

We used Kagi as our official reseller for all Techspansion sales. We had a good working relationship for the years Techspansion was active.

Although VisualHub had not been offered for sale in years I thought it would be a nice gesture to fix some issues that caused it to fail on Mac OS X Lion.
I quietly released some replacement components for free on techspansion.com a month ago for people who still used VisualHub and AudialHub.

Last night, a former customer e-mailed me very confused. He had received an e-mail from Kagi about a Lion updater for VisualHub. For $4.99.

Then my father-in-law calls, asking if I'm going back in business, and just forgotten to mention it to him...

More and more friends, family and former customers began to contact my wife and I last night, wondering what's going on.

We began to realize that our entire customer base (or close to it) had been contacted with an advertisement for the $5 "vHub Updater", something I've never been involved with, which touts our software's name and company name — front and center.

Though FFmpeg and the inner workings of my programs are open-source (FilmRedux, ReduxZero, etc), VisualHub as it exists in the world, is not. I gave no permission and had no prior knowledge of Kagi hosting, redistributing, and indirectly selling the components I wrote in their product.

And I definitely did not (and would never) use the contact info of my company's customers to solicit business like this.

So, here's the gist of it:
A former trusted business partner appropriates my copyrighted code...
...Packages it up and makes it available through an updater...
...Offers it up for sale...
...And mass-mails my customers about it.

Loch said he's in touch with Kagi now to try and resolve the situation.

Kagi's Unofficial Visualhub Upgrade Prompts Response from Original Author

UPDATE: See Kagi's response in this post.

I'm a huge fan of VisualHub. The video conversion application, a "swiss army knife" of video codec goodness, was one of the first pieces of software I bought when I switched to the Mac in 2006. It was sadly discontinued a few years ago by its author Tyler Loch, but it still worked through two subsequent OS X upgrades. It stopped working with the release of OS X Lion a few weeks ago.

Last night I received this exciting email for what I thought was the first official VisualHub upgrade in years:

A quick look at the fine print made it clear this was not an official update, but an opportunity for Kagi, the payment processing system that Visualhub used when it was an active product, to cash in on their former client's success. What's more, a quick visit to the VisualHub website revealed that the update was actually available for free. Loch put in some time to fix his original piece of software and make it available to prior customers so it can keep working.

This morning Loch updated his site with the following warning message:

I've reached out to both Loch and Kagi to figure out what's going on here. On the surface it appears like a really lousy thing on Kagi's part to take the work of a software author, email his customers, and try to profit on his labor. Not cool.

My advice: skip the $4.99 Kagi payment and go directly to the Visualhub website to download the updates. I'll post more at CTTechJunkie.com once I hear back from the parties involved.

UPDATE 12:00 p.m. EDT:  VisualHub author Tyler Loch emailed me this morning to say he has a statement prepared but is waiting to hear from Kagi first.

Enough of the Final Cut Pro X Whining!

As expected pro video editors are freaking out over the new Final Cut Pro X released this past Tuesday.

While I don't blame them given their livelihoods depend on the software tool, I do think people need to calm down a bit. After all, it's not like the current version will stop working now that a new one is out. And this new one is going to revolutionize an industry that has grown too comfortable dealing with inefficient workflows that ultimately only increase billable hours to the client.

This new version of Final Cut is incredibly fast, and it's not just the rendering capabilities. Log and transfer? Gone. Transcoding H.264 digital SLR files to Pro Res? No more. Sync up external audio to video? One click. The ability to add and adjust clips without destroying timings elsewhere in the edit? Priceless.

I have already been using iMovie for the better part of three years now to churn out quick content (a majority of what I do). I've wasted countless hours working through numerous Final Cut Pro glitches with LocalOnlineNews.TV freelancers. I spend hours most weeks remotely assisting reporters who accidentally clicked the wrong button that blew up their timeline, or some other innocent misconfiguration that caused them to have to spend hours fighting with archaic software instead of producing quality content.

For the business I'm building, time is money. And Final Cut Pro X is going to save me a lot of both. Beyond the dramatically reduced workflow complexity it also costs $850 less per seat than before.

It's a winner and for those who prefer to waste time with an inefficient workflow, look out. There's going to be a lot of competitors out there who can get the same job done in far less time and for less money.

Pages

Back to Top